Monday, May 21, 2007

Open letter to North Carolina Senate and House of Representatives

By Sam Gray
Director of Operations
Smoky Mountain Biofuels


We at Smoky Mountain Biofuels are pleased to see the initial acceptance of Senate Bills 1272 and 1277. Certainly (SB 1272), an ASTM standard for biodiesel protects our state's consumers from inferior product, and establishes a benchmark for all North Carolina biodiesel providers wishing to tap the proposed "Biodiesel Incentive Fund." In addition, the logic of Senate Bill 1277 covers North Carolina diesel fleets through manufacturer's warranties that their vehicles shall safely run biodiesel blends such as B20. These bills are an excellent start to a greater acceptance of statewide biodiesel usage.

Momentum must start somewhere, and we are grateful for our state's progressive thinking to create the necessary standards to successfully embrace biodiesel. However, I cannot stress enough that these standards must be followed with meaningful incentives to aid an industry truly in crisis based on recent IRS rulings, and under attack from South Carolina biodiesel produced using a slew of state incentives.

In an earlier statement, I mentioned the recent IRS ruling that provides our federal Volumetric Excise Tax Credit ($1.00/gallon using virgin oils) to "Big Oil" mainstays such as ConocoPhillips. The shameful ruling allows large refineries to blend virgin oils and animal proteins directly into their crude refining stream. The result is a product termed "renewable diesel," which does not have to pass ASTM standards before reaching the end user. Furthermore, refineries do not have to bear the additional infrastructure cost of traditional biodiesel refining equipment to integrate biodiesel into their product mix. This stifles both traditional financing and venture capital avenues for securing a future for existing biodiesel plants. We are praying for the reversal of this ruling, or biodiesel defined by ASTM and endorsed by your Senate Bill 1272 will be replaced in the short term by "renewable diesel," as the American consumer does not understand the difference at this time. The richest companies in the world, operating in some of the most instable places on our planet, will be even further subsidized by the American taxpayer. All this, and nothing to bolster jobs and keep dollars at home.

Concerning our neighbors to the south, South Carolina has passed excellent legislation favoring the development of biodiesel refineries. They boast the largest refinery in the south at this time (Carolina Polymer), and their incentives allow both retailers and producers to benefit from increased biodiesel production. Most of our state's "Biodiesel Producers" are purchasing their biodiesel from South Carolina, since it can be purchased cheaper there than made here. Our proposed "North Carolina Biodiesel Fund" would truly equal the playing field and encourage more statewide production of biodiesel. By creating the incentive fund, North Carolina is poised to meet the anticipated mandates for state vehicles to run B20 or greater, all at a cost (untaxed) equal to or less than the wholesale rack prices from Spartanburg, SC. Consumers and government fleets benefit from the well priced biodiesel that negates South Carolina's lesser excise taxes. Truckers are encouraged to fuel up with B20 in North Carolina when travelling through our state, not waiting to get to South Carolina, Tennessee, or Georgia to take advantage of their cheaper fuel, thanks to their excise tax rate. There is no reason for truckers to fuel when passing through North Carolina, and this guarantees us less dollars spent at retail while increasing the harmful emissions and particulates associated with petroleum diesel. This scenario will never change unless you target diesel, the fuel that moves the trucking transportation sector. The only environmental way to do so is to endorse biodiesel, which would then lead to favoring "state produced" biodiesel to reap the windfalls of jobs and INCREASED STATE EXCISE TAX COLLECTIONS. That's right, a biodiesel incentive fund would actually INCREASE North Carolina Department of Revenue collections by encouraging the largest consumers (18 wheelers) to fuel in state, rather than waiting to arrive in any one of our neighboring states.

The above logic must override legislator fear of decreased road tax collections, and serves our residents over the long term both in air quality and ample money for our impressive road system. This logic also supports House Rep. Pricey Harrison's legislation to negate the state tax on North Carolina biodiesel production, since the overwhelming portion of B20 is still petroleum diesel. The diesel portion still owes taxes at the prevailing state tax rate, with the benefits unique to biodiesel. The "Biodiesel Incentive Fund" in conjunction with Rep. Harrison's "reduction of the state excise tax" will undoubtedly make North Carolina the east coast's leader in biodiesel production. Both pieces of legislation will ensure the North Carolina biodiesel industry's success at a time when our long term viability is threatened by both "Big Oil" and reluctance by state legislators to fully embrace our state's "Strategic Plan" for biofuels leadership.

I will end this plea from one of your own biodiesel producers with facts gained from the latest issue of "Field and Stream" magazine (May 2007). The facts relate to the extraordinary challenges posed by global warming, and reveal a 90% degree of certainty that human-generated greenhouse gases account for most of the global temperature rise seen over the last fifty years. Our state has a proud heritage of outdoorsmanship, and we cherish our waters, forests, and farmland for the bounty they deliver yearly. The most recent "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" (IPCC) report from February 2007 shows that a 3.6 degree increase in global temperatures over the next century would cause massive species extinctions and melting of ice sheets. In addition, stream habitat in the Rocky Mountains would suffer an approximately 50% reduction of trout with an air temperature increase of 4.8 degrees. Global warming would furthermore lessen duck populations throughout the Midwest by up to 69%. The hunting season of the Arctic's Inuit people has already been reduced by 50% thanks to global warming.

Finally, over 70% of sportsmen (National Wildlife Federation poll) feel global warming is a threat to fish and wildlife. Please keep in mind that the effects of global warming are most noticeable at the poles, and will work their way toward the middle as we approach this "critical mass" of greenhouse gases. We are well underway, and it is beyond a legislators "civic duty" to DO SOMETHING NOW to encourage alternatives to the status quo. Understand that we are only a temporary bandage to the aforementioned problems, and we greatly need your assistance to ensure our viability. We can deliver immediate gains rather than banking on the next "holy grail" of transportation (i.e. hydrogen), and we can deliver these gains with your assistance. Please value your streams, your air quality, and your future. Support Sen. Snow's and Rep. Harrison's quality pieces of legislation now without delay, and give us a chance so that we can provide the fuel transition North Carolina has envisioned and so badly needs.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Smoky Mountain Biofuels moves to New Website

Along with its expansion, Smoky Mountain Biofuels has updated its website.

Smoky Mountain Biofuels

Update Senate Bill 1272 and 1277

Senate Bill 1272 has passed third reading.


Further update: Senate Bill 1277 has passed its second and third reading and is heading to the House.

Things are starting to pick-up.

Senate Bill 1272 and 1277

Senate Bill 1272 will be up for 3rd reading today and Senate Bill 1277 is on the calendar for a Second reading. Look for these bills to pass the Senate.


Developing...

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

S1272 Passes Second Reading

Senate Bill 1272, an Act to Define Biodiesel, has passed its Second Reading today. The vote was unanimous. I didn't make to session, so I'm trying to find out what happened on the 3rd reading.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Senate Bills 1272 and 1277

Both of these bills have been reported favorably out of Committee. Bill 1452 was withdrawn in order to make the wording more favorable to biodiesel production in North Carolina.

Developing

Monday, May 14, 2007

Producer Speaks

by Sam Gray
Director of Operations
Smoky Mountain Biofuels


To say the condition of North Carolina's biodiesel producers is "critical" would be an understatement. There are four main producers of biodiesel in our state: Smoky Mountain Biofuels, Foothills Bio-Energies, Piedmont Biofuels, and Blue Ridge Biofuels. We can be labelled as small producers, capable of producing in excess of one million gallons a year per location, with extra capacity available from each producer as market conditions allow. However, with the strength of South Carolina's already passed legislation concerning biodiesel, many of our state's "producers" are encouraged to act more like "distributors" by buying their product out of South Carolina. It is no coincidence that Carolina Polymer out of Taylors, South Carolina, profits with our state's dollars as they leave North Carolina to purchase their fuel. This type of atmosphere, while it may increase public access to biodiesel, does nothing to promote the manufacturing jobs associated with biodiesel factories. This atmosphere will do nothing to push our state closer to its "Strategic Plan for Biofuels Leadership," which envisions OUR STATE meeting OUR CREATED DEMAND.

Sustainable energy is not a commodity that North Carolina should allow to be outsourced to South Carolina, or even Iowa, Nebraska, and Illinois. We have the feedstock for renewable fuels by virtue of incredible amounts of soy oil (Fayetteville), high grade chicken fat, waste vegetable oil, and experimental sources such as sunflower oil throughout the state. We have businesses in place to handle the anticipated demand called on by our "Strategic Plan."

We have petroleum distributors willing to purchase our renewable fuels such as biodiesel, and we have legislators that must understand by now the leadership role that sustainable energy production portrays to their constituents.

The biodiesel legislation sponsored by Senator Snow, most notably Senate Bill 1451, along with recently introduced legislation (House Bill 2003) sponsored by Rep. Pricey Harrison to refund the state's excise tax per gallon to biodiesel producers monthly (simply a zero interest government loan, since we first pay the tax before it is returned weeks later), is responsible legislation that needs action NOW. The Biodiesel Incentive Fund provides production based incentives to North Carolina Biodiesel Producers linked to yearly production. The incentive is received yearly, and while it does not alleviate cash flow concerns of producers waiting for a "refund," it does solidify the vanishing margins seen across the board by biodiesel producers. Rep. Harrison's legislation (the biodiesel portion) allows a producer to make payment on their state excise taxes to the NC Department of Revenue, and then receive the equal refund weeks later.

The cash flow implications are enormous, and allow the increased cash flow to be available immediately for feedstock purchases or equipment upgrades. Both Sen. Snow and House Rep. Harrison have an eye toward the future, as this landmark legislation would launch our state to the forefront of the "Sustainable Energy" movement on the east coast. This legislation would discourage North Carolina dollars migrating southbound to purchase a biodiesel product that is currently cheaper thanks to legislation passed years ago. This legislation encourages smaller biodiesel production facilities throughout the state, which in turn creates more local jobs than the giant biodiesel facilities throughout the Midwest.

When considering such progressive legislation, one must consider the resulting effect on our state's revenue stream before the proposed legislation sunsets. In a time of squeezed budgets and increasing state costs, many legislators might overlook the significance of aiding our existing biodiesel producers. However, I stress that this oversight is akin to negligence, and is incredibly short sighted in nature.

Besides the jobs our industry offers in economically depressed areas, and besides the incredible gains seen by farmers by creating a consistent cash crop, we are reducing our state's dependence on foreign oil sources. We are also improving our air quality, which attracts the out of state people to our area and aids economic growth. They either purchase a primary residence here (for our state's biological diversity and beauty), or they purchase a second home to retire later in life. Either way, the tax base is grown because newcomers see North Carolina as an environmental steward in the south, capable of spurring small business while keeping an eye to the future. The coming years must have sustainable fuels along with conservation oriented measures just to keep our promise to future generations that they, too, can visit the Great Smoky Mountains National Park and have views BETTER than those that exist now, with these smog laden views a shameful reminder of the short sighted nature of industry. Our company's factory resides by these great mountains, and we, through our distributor Mountain Energy, are doing everything in our power to better our region by distributing our locally produced biodiesel.

I challenge this current grouping of NC House Representatives and Senators to promptly review, and enact passage of Rep. Harrison's and Sen. Snow's pieces of legislation. A failure to do so, while seemingly unimportant in the face of teacher pay raises, medical care improvements, etc., would submit to the residents of our great state that sustainable energy is simply ahead of its time, and unable to deliver the gains that we promise are possible. Neither this, nor is the outsourcing of sustainable energy jobs to South Carolina, Iowa, Nebraska, etc. is acceptable. The biodiesel producers in this state are ready to accept the challenge posed by our NC Strategic Plan. We are simply asking for some help and leadership along the way, and are hoping to see such vision this year.